Biases and negative neighborhood views persist in St. Louis online rental market, study finds
Weidenbaum Center Associate Director Ariela Schachter is interviewed on St. Louis Public Radio about new study she co-authored.
January 2024
Weidenbaum Center Grant Recipient James L. Gibson's research highlighted in The New York Times
Weidenbaum Center Resident Fellow Jake Rosenfeld quoted in KCUR Radio article
Weidenbaum Center Faculty Research Fellow Andrea Katz quoted in Bloomberg Law
Weidenbaum Center Executive Committee Member Adia Wingfield on why black women leaders are often "Last In, First Out"
Weidenbaum Center Research Fellow Timothy McBride on spike in marketplace plan enrollment as state purges Medicaid rolls
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." ~Margaret Mead
Read more about the groundbreaking research we fundTerrified or Enraged? Emotional Microfoundations of Public Counterror Attitudes. Professor Carly Wayne recently had an article published in the journal International Organization. The article was additionally published online by the Cambridge University Press. Professor Wayne's research, funded in part by the Weidenbaum Center, shows that while fear is one well-recognized emotional response to terror threats, in societies where terrorism is rare, anger may play a more pivotal role, with distinct consequences for citizens' downstream political attitudes. Her findings illuminate strategic incentives shaping militants' use of terror tactics, electoral constraints leaders face in formulating counterterror policy, and the emotional mechanisms fueling cycles of political violence.
Read the StoryVoters Care about Women's Leadership in Elected Office. Research by Professor O'Brien, Professor Amanda Clayton (University of California, Berkeley), and Professor Jennifer Piscopo (Royal Holloway University of London), uncovers interesting new data on citizens' attitudes about political representation. Their research results show that citizens strongly prefer that political decision-making bodies have gender parity, meaning equal numbers of men and women. When women are represented in elected office, even with quotas in place, the institutions are seen as more fair, more trustworthy, and ultimately more democratic. These results counter critics who claim that gender quotas would diminish the quality of political representation. This research shows that citizens actually like quotas' results, because women's presence indicates that governments are working for everyone, yielding more democratic outcomes.
Read the StoryDemocracy's Destruction? The 2020 Election, Trump's Insurrection, and the Strength of America's Political Institutions James L. Gibson has received numerous grants from the Weidenbaum Center for his research and survey work connected to political institutions, the U.S. Supreme Court, the presidency, and the U.S. Senate. Based on surveys of representative samples of the American people in July 2020, December 2020, March 2021, and June 2021, this forthcoming book (coming in May 2024, the Russell Sage Foundation), examines in great detail whether American political institutions lost legitimacy over the period from before the 2020 presidential election to well after it, and whether any such loss is associated with the "Big Lie" about the election and its aftermath. Gibson's highly contrarian conclusion is simple: try as they might (and did), Trump and his Republicans did not in fact succeed in undermining the legitimacy of American national political institutions. Professor Gibson will be speaking about this book at the University of Michigan in March 2024, as part of the annual Miller-Converse Lecture Series. The dedication for this forthcoming book reads as follows: "To Washington University in St. Louis, and especially its Weidenbaum Center - Because its difficult to image a university that is more supportive of social science research."
Read the Story